9 September 2013
All members use rigorous peer review to select the best research to fund.
All our members:
- Follow AMRC principles of peer review to ensure they all work to the same high standards.
- Publish a research strategy to show how the research they fund benefits patients and is part of the funding ecosystem.
- Have a conflicts of interest policy for their scientific advisory panels so that all funding decisions are impartial.
Quality and standards
- Our five principles of peer review are: accountability, balance, independent decision making, rotation and impartiality.
- We assess charities’ peer review processes when they apply for membership and carry out an audit of all members every five years.
- Universities, government and funding bodies use AMRC membership as a hallmark of quality.
Data and impact
- Our five-yearly audit provides quality and benchmarking data on how AMRC members carry out peer review.
- Funding from AMRC members that is awarded in universities via peer review and open competition is eligible for the Charity Research Support Fund (CRSF). The fund adds up to 28p to every charity pound invested in universities.